• Connecticut Appellate Court
  • AC 34559
  • Aug 13 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Pellegrino, J.
Because the plaintiff sought a prejudgment remedy on a contemplated domestic action to enforce an agreement, the rule did not apply from the 2004 Connecticut Supreme Court case of Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company, that Connecticut's "prejudgment remedy statutes do not provide authority for the issuance of a prejudgment remedy to secure an action brought to enforce a potential foreign judgment."

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now