Connecticut Supreme Court Year In Review 2013

The Connecticut Law Tribune

   |0 Comments

SC Year In Review: Attorney, Landlord Had Duty To Use Reasonable Care To Prevent Harm

 

By BRENDEN LEYDON


The Connecticut Supreme Court decided many interesting cases regarding tort issues this year. One recent case just posted in mid-September shed new light on a variety of complex issues. Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh arose from the kidnapping of the plaintiff's daughter, Saba, by the plaintiff's ex-husband, who took the 2-year-old child back to Iran.

 

SC Year In Review: Boundary Lines, Dog Bites And Variances



By DWIGHT H. MERRIAM


Before our annual walkabout among the land-related decisions of the Connecticut Supreme Court, let us highlight what you need to watch out for this coming year.

 

 

SC Year In Review: Two New Faces And One Dissenting Voice

 

By DAN KRISCH


The past year was one of transition for the Connecticut Supreme Court: Two new justices with atypical resumes and pioneering personal histories, Andrew McDonald and Carmen Espinosa, joined the Court in early 2013. Meanwhile, Justice Dennis Eveleigh emerged as a thoughtful, frequent dissenter whose judicial philosophy often diverged from the Court's mainstream.
 


SC Year In Review: Loan Servicer Has Standing To Foreclose

 

By JOSEPH J. CHERICO



On July 16, 2013, the Connecticut Supreme Court addressed an issue of first impression in J.E. Robert Co. v. Signature Properties LLC, 309 Conn. 307 (2013). Specifically, the Court held that a loan servicer for the owner and holder of a note and mortgage has standing in its own right to bring a foreclosure action against the mortgagor.


 

SC Year In Review: Justices Wade Into World Of Metadata



By DANIEL J. KLAU


History may describe the Connecticut Supreme Court's 2012-2013 term as the "eye of the hurricane" with respect to First Amendment and freedom of information cases.



 

SC Year In Review: Child Support Rulings Focus On Wealthy Parents
 


By LIVIA BARNDOLLAR

During the past term, the Supreme Court has readdressed how child support awards should be developed when the parents are high income earners.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202621675209

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.