One Hand Clapping

Opinion: Trial Conflict Creates A Close Call

, The Connecticut Law Tribune


Norm Pattis

For about 48 hours, I was in despair, and was not at all sure what I would do. I was called into trial in a criminal case, and had begun the slow-motion process of picking a jury, one soul at a time, in a case that looks as though it will last a month or so. There's no telling when and whether a client might change his mind, and enter a plea to avoid trial's risks. But in this case, it's safe bet we'll go all the way to a verdict.

So I filed a motion to continue a civil court trial scheduled to take place during the criminal trial. In our moving papers, we recited the conflicting trial schedule.

"The motion has been denied," my office manager told me over the phone.

All at once, I faced the prospect of cloning, contempt or malpractice.

Both the trial I am on, and the trial that the judge would not delay, were in the same courthouse. I pulled the court file to read the court's ruling on the denied motion. I should have known that there would be a potential conflict when I appeared in the civil case, the judge wrote.


The judge was, of course, right. I knew there could be a conflict.

The civil case is old and bitter. Just how bitter is a mystery to me; when I called opposing counsel to discuss it, he did not return the call. My client's prior lawyer moved for permission to withdraw in June. The motion was granted in late July. The client came to me, in need of a lawyer, and we filed an appearance in early August.

I can no more forecast which of the cases in my office will settle than I can predict the weather. Indeed, this year, it seems like no one wants to settle; everyone wants a trial, and all at once.

"Why won't you let your client plead?" a lawyer asked the other day.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202624223722

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.