Should Impairment Issues Stop Lawyers From Practicing?

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   | 1 Comments

Just like lawyers, doctors occasionally suffer from the debilitating impacts of alcohol and drug addiction, mental illness and age-related mental decline. But unlike their brethren in the legal profession, which is governed by a code of professional conduct that takes a punitive approach when impairment issues arise, Connecticut doctors can continue to practice as long as they take steps to get help.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Kenneth Laska

    Many years ago during my 35 year term as the Chair of the Insurance Proposals for the Bar Committee I made a suggestion on how to deal with impaired attorneys. The CBA would set up a Committee for Impaired Attorneys. When the court or the grievance committee learned that an attorney was impaired, the impaired attorney would be given a choice. He could be disbarred or enter treatment while one of the committee members would step in, take over his practice, and all money earned would go to running the office and income for the impaired attorney. Then the impaired attorney could slowly return to practice and hopefully to a better life.

    This would solve the problem of clients being inadequately represented or the reluctance of the attorney to seek treatment for fear of losing his income. The malpractice carriers would probably welcome this because it could stop some very serious claims. Finally the fact that the Committee attorneys would serve free of charge, should not be a problem, because I have found many attorneys who have bent over backwards to help a fellow attorney in need. Moreover the impaired attorney would see that those sitting on this committee, were very well known and respected, so there would not be the fear that their practice was going to fall into the hands of someone ill equipped to run it.

    However the CBA for whatever reason did not feel that this was something that interested them. So now we have this symposium for the leaders of the Bar to wring their hands, say woe is me, and to make the momentous discovery that water is wet.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202625192421

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.