Jury Returns Defense Verdict In CVS Parking Lot Accident
Barbara Lucas v. Louis Tine et al.: A woman who claims a pickup truck backed into her vehicle in a drug store parking lot and caused her back and neck injuries was unable to convince a jury that the truck driver was at fault.
On March 31, 2009, at around noon, Louis Tine, 56, of Newington, was driving a Town of Newington-owned pickup that was carrying mulch, according to his lawyer, Philip Dunn Jr., of Jackson O'Keefe in Hartford.
Tine was about to dump the mulch near a town-owned sign on Main Street in Newington. But Tine wasn't feeling well that day and decided to stop in a nearby CVS for cough drops, according to Dunn.
There is considerable dispute as to what happened next. Dunn said his client drove into the pharmacy parking lot, noticed three empty spots near the drive-thru and figured that since the lane was empty, he would make use of it as he backed his truck into one of the spots.
"It's a lot easier to back in than back out with a truck like that," said Dunn.
As Tine drove into the drive-thru lane, he put the vehicle in reverse and began backing into the spot. After feeling an impact, he looked in the rear-view mirror and saw that his truck had collided with a station wagon driven by Barbara Lucas, who was 73 at the time.
The left side of Lucas' vehicle was damaged. Dunn noted that some mulch fell to the ground outside a white parking space line. There was also glass in the vicinity.
Lucas claimed she followed Tine into the lot and was only about four feet behind his bumper. She thought he was either going to go through the drive-thru the wrong way or back into a parking space. However, Lucas said that as Tine began backing up, she saw that his pickup was moving toward her. She claims she hit the gas and turned to the left but could not avoid the collision.
Lucas argued the accident happened in the lane of travel in the parking lot and not near the parking spot.
But Dunn argued that the placement of the mulch and glass at the accident scene offered evidence that Tine's version of events was more accurate. A responding police officer, who later testified at the trial, also backed Tine's version of the accident.