NFL Case Puts Issue In Spotlight For Employment Lawyers

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   |0 Comments

George E. O'Brien

Miami Dolphins offensive lineman Jonathan Martin—allegedly the victim of bullying by teammates—will not be returning to the field this season, the team announced last week. Martin is talking to the team and the media through legal counsel and the NFL is investigating what took place in the Miami locker room.

It's a far cry from the goings-on by the water cooler in your office break room. Or is it?

Bullying in the workplace raises legal and public policy issues that concern employers and employees alike. In a survey last year, 35 percent of workers said they had felt bullied on the job. The CareerBuilder study found that the number of employees complaining of workplace bullying has risen in recent years.

And allegations of bullying in the workplace can give rise to claims against employers. Claims of bullying behaviors in the workplace lead to lawsuits over discrimination, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress and even assault. Workplace bullies may target victims because of their race, gender, disability or sexual orientation, for example. Indeed, in the Jonathan Martin case, one of Martin's fellow players allegedly used racial epithets in bullying him.

"Right now, the liability that comes out of the nastiness of supervisors generally [involves] a protected class," said George O'Brien, a shareholder at Littler Mendelson in New Haven who counsels management in employment cases. "If a supervisor targets women or targets gays or targets disabled people, the employer is liable for the acts of its supervisor. Or if coworkers target protected classes … then the employer, put on notice of that, has to do something about it."

"Bullying" itself, however, is not actionable in Connecticut. And efforts have stalled over the last decade to pass a state law that would specifically ban bullying in the workplace. A bill proposed in the legislature in 2008 that would have created a private right of action with respect to workplace bullying died in committee.

"Workplace bullying is very much like domestic violence. It is intimate, especially when people work closely with one another and do so for many years," Katherine Hermes, a coordinator of Connecticut Healthy Workplace Advocates, said in testimony supporting the bill. "Bullying at work reduces productivity, causes employees' health to decline resulting in sick days and personal leave, and disrupts the thing most people want to do: their jobs."

Connecticut's business community pushed back hard against the proposed legislation, said state Rep. Roberta Willis, a Litchfield County Democrat who is the bill's sponsor. Ultimately, advocates for the legislation shifted their focus to bills that would apply exclusively to state workers. A bill requiring the state to track complaints of workplace violence and "abusive conduct" by state employees was introduced in 2011, but it too failed to become law.

Proponents and critics of efforts to legislate prohibitions on workplace bullying agree on the biggest sticking point: How to ban behavior that is abusive without infringing on an employer's need to manage its employees, which may include disciplinary action.

"The difficulty with an antibullying statute is that it's not well defined," O'Brien said. When it comes to "bullying" behaviors, O'Brien said, the risk of a legislative prohibition is that it could "just take anything that bothers somebody and turn it into a potential cause of action."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202631272890

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.