Former East Haven Officer Gets Two Years In Bias Case

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   |0 Comments

A white former police officer accused of being part of a conspiracy to harass Latinos has been sentenced to two years in prison on an obstruction charge.

Jason Zullo was sentenced Monday in federal court in Hartford. Prosecutors had sought the two-year sentence, while Zullo's lawyer had asked a judge for no more than a year.

Zullo and three other white officers were charged last year with abusing and harassing Latinos in predominantly white East Haven. Zullo entered a deal, pleading guilty to obstruction by falsifying a police report after his cruiser repeatedly struck a motorcycle. In a statement to Judge Alvin Thompson, he denied being a racist. "I did not patrol the streets looking to prey upon Hispanics and repeat offenders," he said.

His lawyer, Norm Pattis, had argued the victim on the motorcycle was Italian-American and the court shouldn't consider the conspiracy in passing sentence. He called the sentence "fundamentally unfair and an overreaction by the court."

Prosecutors argued it was all part of the same case. "He is part of a group of renegade cops who acted in complete violation of individuals' liberties and constitutional rights," Assistant U.S. Attorney Krishina Patel said.

The officers were accused of assaulting people while they were handcuffed, unlawfully searching Latino businesses and harassing and intimidating people, including advocates, witnesses and other officers who tried to investigate or report their misconduct or abuse.

Police treatment of Latinos in East Haven has been under federal scrutiny since 2009, when the Department of Justice launched a civil rights probe that found a pattern of discrimination and biased policing.

Pattis said Zullo was sentenced for conduct to which he didn't plead guilty and likely will appeal. "The leap from a justified pursuit of a fleeing Italian-American on a motorcycle to a racially-motivated bigot with a badge is, simply ridiculous," he wrote in a presentencing report.

Patel argued that the conspiracy had been proved in the trial of two other defendants.

The judge called the obstruction part of a course of conduct in which Zullo "repeatedly abused his authority."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202633456606

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.