Conn. Lawsuit Challenges Obamacare Abortion Provisions

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   | 3 Comments

The head of a right-to-life group and his wife have filed what's being billed as a groundbreaking federal lawsuit in Connecticut, challenging the health care options available in the state under the Affordable Care Act.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Patrick

    These people lack standing. After their tax credits their monthly payment is only $2.63, hardly an economic hardship. Furthermore no one is forcing them to engage in behavior they find offensive any more than paying taxes for roads allows persons to drive to an abortion clinic. Another example of religious people forcing their beliefs on others.

  • Ken Lenz

    What if I wanted a health insurance policy that did not cover negros, because my belief was that they were subhuman and should not entitled to see "white persons‘" doctors, and I should not have to pay for that? Wouldn‘t that be an unconstitutional violation of my First Amendment Rights using the same distorted logic. Health Insurance policies are matters of public health, not free speech. The plaintiffs will never be required to obtain an abortion under Obamacare. That is their protected constitutional right, not the right to deprive others of an abortion procedure.

  • Roger

    Obamacare is clearly unconstitutional on any number of fronts. The abortion coverage is just one of them. It‘s about time, voters realized that "liberals" are about anything but freedom. This is what happens when you elect a Marxist as president.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202654220324

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.