Judge Described Limitations Of Voyeurism Law In Dismissing Charges

A Wilton man accused of videotaping encounters with women had his charges dismissed, fueling a debate about the existing law and what it means to be in "plain view."

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • P.S.

    An opinion from the Electronic Frontier Foundation may be helpful to all engaged and involved.

  • PS

    The problem with the legislation proposed by Rep. Rebimbas is that is has gone too far in the other direction. Equating voyeurism with sexual predators is misguided and wrong. It open the door to a scenario where false claims with life altering implications will be made threaten people who are otherwise committing no crime. This is especially concerning given that recording devices are everywhere these days and in the palms on everyone‘s hands. Will someone who sets up a nanny cam or who records a person in public place now need to be nervous that they will be threatened being labelled a sexual predator and have their names placed on a registry - for life? This seems to be legislation designed not to extend and offer real new protections - but solely to ensure that the legal industry has a new crop of clients who need to defend against false claims and allegations.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202654850672

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.

Recommended for You