Norm Pattis: Rules Of Evidence Tortured At Administrative Hearing

The Connecticut Law Tribune

   | 1 Comments

I generally try to stay out of administrative hearings of any sort. Putting on evidence without the reliance on the code of evidence seems too much like, well, sex without a condom. Poking and prodding without protection is going to yield all sorts of infection.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Rules Of Evidence Tortured At Administrative Hearing

What's being said

  • Tom O‘Brien

    Norm, that is a great description of administrative hearings. There is NO code of evidence for such hearings. One would ask about due process as well...

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202658985447

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.