Norm Pattis: State Endorses Accused Killer's Goofy Defense NORM PATTIS, The Connecticut Law Tribune June 26, 2014 | 1 Comments share share by mail share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints There is something perversely delightful about the state Supreme Court's decision in the case of State v. Lishan Wang. Call it the revenge of informed consent in legal ethics. Sign up for a free digital membership and get great benefits like: Already Registered? Sign In now 5 free articles* every 30 days, from other ALM publications Exclusive discounts on ALM events and products Connecticut Law Tribune digital newsletter, plus your choice of more than 30 digital newsletters Access on the device of your choice: smartphone, tablet, or desktop Unlimited free access to Corporate Counsel and Law Technology News online Create Account with LinkedIn Register Now *May exclude premium content VIEW COMMENTS ( 1 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Matt Jun 26, 2014 What??? Norm Pattis agreeing with the status quo? Hmmm... folding? Maturing, maybe? A lightening of the wallet brought on by pro se litigants? What doest thou think about the professional arrogance or some lesser form of madness that is sometimes found among counsel? More importantly, what am I to make of my own assessment that all one needs to do is wet one‘s finger, raise it in the air to determine which way the wind is blowing, and one can be assured that you, dear Norm, are going in the opposite direction? For the first time ever, I find you unpredictable! The world as I know it has ended. Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202661028613 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.