Practitioners Say Appeals Process is Widely Misunderstood

According to appellate court judges and practitioners alike, appellate practice in Connecticut requires a specialized form of advocacy that is not understood by all litigants.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Patrick D.

    Very interesting article, and comments from our top Judges. The sad thing is that it appears some of our states Superior Court judges have and continue to use the appellate process to punish litigants - especially those who are self represented, but even some that are represented by counsel. A cursory glance at the appeals filed over the last 24 months yields some very interesting (and disturbing) trends. It appears that certain actions are ‘capable of repetition, yet evade review.‘

    In a surprising number of family cases, litigants are forced into a Hobson‘s choice of sorts. If they dare to appeal, they are forced to endure the wrath of the same trial court judge for the duration of their appeal. Often leading to punitive rulings disguised as ‘judicial discretion‘, leading to increased financial pressure, loss of custody, threat of incarceration, and a host of other all-to-common tactics. Few can navigate the complex rules of appellate procedure, and a review of recent decisions demonstrates just how often appeals are dismissed due to an inadequate brief or record.

    It is time our high courts step in and send a clear message back down to the lower courts that the appellate and supreme court dockets are NOT to be used as a detention center for targeted litigants. This serves NOBODY and does nothing to help our judicial branch meet its objective of serving the public.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202668091591

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.


Recommended for You

    loading...