Verbal testimony in personal injury and criminal cases can convey to a judge or jury the pain and suffering a plaintiff or victim has endured. But evidence that re-creates the person's subjective experience, in as much sensory richness as possible, seems to be much more dramatic and effective, claims Quinnipiac University School of Law associate dean and professor Neal Feigenson.
- Judge Sides With Woman Mauled by Dogs, Awards $132,295 for Injuries
- Dividing Qualified Retirement Plan in Divorce Via a Qualified Domestic Relations Order
- Fired GE Employee Files Age Discrimination Suit
- Judge OKs Fraud, Breach-of-Contract Suit Against Nationwide Insurance
- UConn's First JD-MD Grad Confronts Talk of 'Betrayal'
- Man Gets Prison for Using Fake Attorney to Scam Veterans