• Connecticut Appellate Court
  • AC 35062
  • Aug 13 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Bear, J.
The distinction drawn between continuing and permanent nuisances and trespasses for statute of limitations purposes, although not previously addressed by Connecticut's appellate courts, has achieved wide recognition in the Superior Court and other jurisdictions and, here, whether alleged nuisance and trespass by underground rhizomes and above ground bamboo were continuing or permanent presented a genuine issue of material fact.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now