• Connecticut Supreme Court
  • SC 18885
  • Sep 17 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Zarella, J.
In a foreclosure action, title vesting in the purchaser does not strip the court of its jurisdiction over the sale proceeds and, here, the purchaser could intervene in supplemental proceedings to seek a return of the purchase price after title to the property passed when cumulative errors caused the purchaser to buy property that, unbeknownst by him, but known by the second mortgagee, was subject to a first mortgage foreclosed shortly thereafter.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now