• U.S. District Court
  • 3:12cv1121
  • Oct 01 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Chatigny, J.
Disqualification is required when "an objective, disinterested observer fully informed of the underlying facts [would] entertain significant doubt that justice would be done absent recusal," pursuant to U.S. v. Carlton, a 2008 decision of the 2nd Circuit.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now