Health Law
Decision
Sargis v. Donahue
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, May 20, 2013
As stated in the 2006 Appellate Court case of Medes v. Geico Corporation, "it [is] the jury's task to determine the credibility of the witnesses, including experts, and to weigh the evidence."
Decision
Freedom of Information Officer v. Freedom of Information Commission
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, May 20, 2013
Documents that result from a convicted individual's physical and dental exams may not pertain to a legitimate matter of public concern and may be highly offensive, if disclosed.
Decision
Squeo v. The Norwalk Hospital Association
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, May 13, 2013
To prevail on a bystander emotional distress claim, a plaintiff may be required to prove that the emotional distress was severe and debilitating.
Decision
Gianetti v. Gombos
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, April 29, 2013
The Appellate Court summarily affirmed the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the self-represented defendants, David and Catherine Gombos, and was not persuaded by the claims on appeal of the pro se plaintiff, Charles Gianetti, a physician.
Decision
Bell v. Marrakech Inc.
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, April 22, 2013
Business entities that are not licensed or supervised by the Department of Public Health may not qualify as "health care providers," for purposes of Connecticut General Statutes §52-190a(a).
Decision
Bavedas v. Middlesex Health System Inc.
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, April 8, 2013
A written opinion may be sufficient for a medical institution, if the opinion is sufficient for one agent of the medical institution.
Decision
Nichols v. The Milford Pediatric Group, P.C.
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, April 8, 2013
A plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirements of Connecticut General Statutes §52-109a(a) and attach a good faith certificate to a medical malpractice complaint and a written letter from a similar health care provider, results in a defect in process that implicates the personal jurisdiction of the court.
Decision
Gill v. American Red Cross
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, April 1, 2013
Connecticut General Statutes §52-190a, which requires that medical-malpractice plaintiffs file a written opinion from a similar healthcare provider, applies to a plaintiff who alleges that the American Red Cross failed to conduct tests and to provide warnings to an individual who donated blood.
Decision
Nestico v. Weyman
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, February 4, 2013
A dental malpractice action was properly dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of Connecticut General Statutes §52-190a, which pertain to the filing of a good faith certificate with the complaint and a signed opinion of a similar health care provider.
Decision
Toussaint v. Hartford Hospital
-
- Subscription Required
Monday, January 7, 2013
The False Claims Act requires that a plaintiff serve the complaint, along with evidence, in camera, on the Attorney General, and then bring the complaint in the name of the state.
