• Connecticut Supreme Court
  • SC 18737
  • Jun 03 2014 (Date Decided)
  • Norcott, J.
To obtain review of an unpreserved claim of constitutional error under the 1989 Connecticut Supreme Court case of State v. Golding, a defendant need only raise that claim in his main brief wherein he must, as stated in the 2009 Appellate Court decision in State v. Wright, "present a record that is [adequate] for review and affirmatively [demonstrate] that his claim is indeed a violation of a fundamental constitutional right;" and, to the extent that the Supreme Court's 2002 decision in State v. Ramos and its progeny requires an affirmative request for Golding review, those cases were overruled.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now