Housing Authority Settles Discrimination Case

, The Connecticut Law Tribune

   |0 Comments

Maziarz v. Housing Authority of the Town of Vernon: A man who claims the Vernon Housing Authority discriminated against disabled, senior-citizen tenants has settled his lawsuit with the agency for $215,000.

The Vernon Housing Authority is a quasi-public agency receiving state and federal funds used to operate and manage subsidized housing in Vernon.

In 2009, Robert Maziarz applied to, and was accepted to be a tenant in, the Vernon Housing Authority's senior and disabled housing. In addition to a lease agreement, a housing coordinator in Vernon sent Maziarz a copy of a "personal care sponsor" form to be completed.

The personal care sponsor forms required a third party to verify that applicants, despite their disability, can take care of themselves. The forms also designated someone to assume responsibility if a disabled tenant's condition were to worsen to the point that he were unable to care for themselves. Among other obligations, the sponsor had to agree to assist in relocating the tenant to another facility if, according to the housing authority, the tenant's condition "prevents self-care and maintenance in the apartment."

Greg Kirschner, legal director of the Connecticut Fair Housing Center, represented Maziarz in the subsequent lawsuit against the Vernon Housing Authority.

Kirschner explained that the authority told prospective tenants that the personal care sponsor form was required and that it could jeopardize their housing if it was not filled out in a timely manner. Specifically, Maziarz was told he could not pick up the keys to his new apartment until he turned in the form.

Kirschner said the form was discriminatory because not all tenants of the authority were required to fill one out. The form contained provisions based expressly on whether a tenant had a disability, which Kirschner said violates the federal Fair Housing Act.

The federal law extends protections "to individuals with disabilities to ensure that paternalistic concerns could not be used to disqualify them from housing," said Kirschner. "When it amended the Fair Housing Act to include disability as a protected class, Congress specifically noted that it was doing so to repudiate the use of stereotypes and ignorance and to make a clear pronouncement of a national commitment to end the unnecessary exclusion of individuals with disabilities from the American mainstream. Independent living policies are precisely what the FHA is intended to eliminate."

The Connecticut Fair Housing Center filed the lawsuit against the Vernon Housing Authority in 2011. About six months later, Kirschner said new tenants in Vernon were no longer given the forms.

However, the authority, through its lawyer in the case, Kevin Coles of Coles, Baldwin & Kaiser in Fairfield, disputed Maziarz's claim until the eve of trial, when a settlement was reached. Coles did not return calls for comment.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202635970334

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.