• U.S. District Court
  • U.S. District Court
  • 3:09cv1071
  • Oct 25 2012 (Date Decided)
  • Eginton, J.
Lack of proof of direct economic harm is not an affirmative defense to a worker's claim he was sexually harassed, because his immediate supervisor allegedly forced the worker to engage in anal and oral sex.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now