Doe v. University of Connecticut November 5, 2012 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints U.S. District Court Eginton, J. Lack of proof of direct economic harm is not an affirmative defense to a worker's claim he was sexually harassed, because his immediate supervisor allegedly forced the worker to engage in anal and oral sex. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202577740351 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.