State v. Clue November 26, 2012 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Connecticut Appellate Court Pellegrino, J. Where the primary purpose of a 911 call was to enable the 911 operator to obtain from the victim the information necessary to meet an ongoing emergency, the victim's statements were not testimonial hearsay. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202579322820 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.