• Connecticut Appellate Court
  • Connecticut Appellate Court
  • AC 33080
  • Jan 15 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Bear, J.
The mere presence of unidentified DNA, in addition to the defendant's DNA on evidence, did not render the evidence that his DNA was present irrelevant or nonprobative; the presence of the other DNA was a matter for the jury's consideration.

This premium content is reserved for Connecticut subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now