Custody Battle Costs Are Focus of Task Force

Hector Morera is a 46-year-old father of two from Glastonbury who is immersed in a four-year-long divorce proceeding and custody dispute. Like 85 percent of Connecticut parties in custody disputes, he is representing himself.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Marisa Ringel

    Why is a GAL remaining on a case if she/he is unable to solve any of the issues? Here is a recommendation that I hope Thomas Weissmuller and the rest of the task force is listening to: Put a term limit on a GAL. Give them 6 mos, or 1 year, to solve the disputes. Then have their term expire. If both parties agree to keep them on, so be it. But if one party does not, then get them off the case after a year. The GAL should give their report into the case file at 6 mos and at 1 year, and then move off the case. If they can?t help in a years time then that guardian is not the right person for that family.

    I would say to those guardian ad litem or attorneys that say ??the costs are being run up by ?conflict addicted? parents.? this: Why are you staying on the case taking money from an addict? Remove yourself. If you can?t help stop the conflict you are NOT the right guardian ad litem or NOT the right attorney for the family. Get off the case. Stop just sitting there in the middle of the conflict collecting money and doing nothing effective. To the attorneys and guardian ad litems that stay on high-conflict cases I will say this, you might call us ?conflict-addicted?, I will call you ?solution inept?.

    Good luck to the Task Force to Study Legal Disputes Involving the Care and Custody of Minor Children. This state needs your wisdom and guidance desperately.

    God bless the children,
    Marisa Ringel

  • Andrew

    The GAL system in Connecticut is simply an scam run by judges for benefit of their lawyer friends. The state contracts for GAL services through Office of Chief Public Defender at $50/hr. Judges make parents who have money pay their pet GAL's $300 /hr. Susan Storey has plenty of qualified GAL's on her list that get no work, but judges keep the spoils going to their friends. No tax reporting, no documentation of work performed, just the judge's nod that the parents must pay. In other states the rate is set by the court and paid by the state. Avoids the conflict of interest created when the judge's pet lawyer is appointed to bankrupt the parents and steal money saved for the future of the children. Pretty good gig. Sheeple of Corrupticut cannot govern their own courts.

    Funny how their is no auditable trail of the payments to these GAL's. A $40k transaction ordered by the court goes unreported to the just guess why?

  • Nicole

    So give up fighting for your child or go bankrupt??? Real nice!

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202626252078

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.

Recommended for You