Circuit Finds No Reasonable Suspicion for 'Terry' Stop

, New York Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm has been vacated by a divided Second Circuit, which found that police were unable to assess the credibility of an unknown caller and had no other information to corroborate two anonymous 911 tips that a man was carrying a gun in the Bronx.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Matthew Siegel

    While I am not a criminal lawyer, nor involved in the criminal legal system, nor even a student of criminal law, one can only ponder just how "specific and articulable" and drily logical do circumstances otherwise have to be to warrant the stopping of a suspect under Terry-v-Ohio -- a case I have not read since attending law school and studying for the Bar exam some thirty years ago? Conversely, at the cost of public safety and civic duty I am in a quandary as to why it is such an unreasonable imposition for our police to stop and question an otherwise "presumed-innocent" citizen regarding REASONABLY SUSPECTED criminal activity if such person truly has nothing to hide -- especially in this post-"9/11" world! Clearly, the utility of preventing criminal conduct ineluctably trumps the risk of its occurrence where the eye of ordinary vigilance and practical wisdom -- albeit based on perhaps less-than-perfect, although possibly reliable, information -- dictates that a crime has or is about to be committed and something ought to be done!



    Yours,



    Matthew Siegel

    White Plains, New York

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202627088077

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.