O'Brien v. O'Brien April 7, 2014 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Fairfield J.D., at Bridgeport Pinkus, J. A court can find that a party who allegedly acts on advice of counsel when he exercises stock options and sells stock, in violation of the court's automatic orders, is not in contempt of court. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202649949650 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.